ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû

Rights of light


The right to light is an easement that is frequently the source of dispute.

An owner of land has no natural right to light at common law. Accordingly, it must be established that the right has been obtained by grant or prescription.

A grant of a right of light may be express, implied, or pursuant to the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows.

In respect of acquiring the right by way of prescription, there are three ways that the right can be claimed:

  1. •

    under the Prescription Act 1832 (PA 1832)

  2. •

    at common law, or

  3. •

    by lost modern grant

The latter two methods are rarely used

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Property Disputes News

Property Disputes weekly highlights—12 December 2024

This week's edition of Property Disputes weekly highlights includes: a High Court decision granting a final injunction against protestors, Upper Tribunal decisions on whether communal electricity charges that did not account for the use of solar panels were reasonably incurred, the threshold for unreasonable behaviour capable of justifying an order for costs, and calculation of ‘internal floor area’ for the purposes of the right to manage. It also includes the 178th Practice Direction update to the Civil Procedure Rules, the Ministry of Justice’s decision to publish the names of claimants of money judgments on the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines in England and Wales, and amendments to the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal (Chambers) Order.

How long is twelve months? Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) considers principles for calculation of time periods (Moh v Rimal Properties Ltd; Kelly v Bostall Estates Ltd)

Property Disputes analysis: These appeals (heard together) concerned two applications for rent repayment orders against landlords who had each been managing a house in multiple occupation (HMO) without a licence. Both applications were dismissed as out of time, with this being upheld on appeal. In deciding the appeal, the Upper Tribunal (UT) had to decide how the expression ‘in the period of 12 months ending with the day on which the application is made’ was to be construed. In so doing, the judge considered the leading authorities on the construction of time periods, before finding these did not cover the statutory language used. It is a useful reminder to all practitioners that a time period can be shorter than it first appears. The judge also had to decide at what point in time a defence under section 72 of the Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) is deemed to arise for the purpose of calculating the time period. Written by Joseph Bunting and Timothy Foot, barristers, Maitland Chambers, London.

Names of claimants of money judgments to be published on the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines in England and Wales

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has concluded its consultation on the proposal to include the names of claimants on the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines in England and Wales (the Register). The consultation sought views on amending legislation to allow the names of claimants in money judgments from the County Court and High Court to be published on the Register. After analysing the responses, the MoJ has decided to implement the proposal and plans to lay Regulations in parliament to put this into effect.

Property Disputes weekly highlights—5 December 2024

This week's edition of Property Disputes weekly highlights includes: Court of Appeal decisions on the Tenant Fees Act 2019 and estoppel in an adverse possession claim, High Court decisions concerning occupiers’ liability, mesne profits, and non-payment of a court fee when issuing a lease renewal claim, and Upper Tribunal decisions on modification of a restrictive covenant and the application of non-domestic rates to barristers’ chambers. It also includes the publication of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)’s new Remediation Acceleration Plan (RAP), the MHCLG’s consultation on permitted insurance fees for landlords and freeholders, and the Supreme Court and Privy Council’s new websites and online Case Management Portal.

View Property Disputes by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Rights of light claims

Rights of light claimsThis Practice Note considers whether there is an actionable interference with a right of light, the available remedies (an injunction or damages), and how to seek injunctive relief, including which court, the procedure and documents required.Is there an interference with the

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenants

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenantsThis Practice Note explains when damages might be awarded in lieu of an injunction, how damages are assessed and what happens if the beneficiary delays in claiming for the breach.Damages or injunction—the testThe primary remedy for breach of a restrictive

Establishing and maintaining rights of light

Establishing and maintaining rights of lightThis Practice Note considers when and how a right of light can be established, whether through grant or prescription (a prescriptive right of light is most commonly established under the Prescription Act 1832), and considers when a right of light might be

An individual has had uninterrupted use of land for over 20 years but the use is then interrupted for a

An individual has had uninterrupted use of land for over 20 years but the use is then interrupted for a significant period (3–4 years). Would this interruption defeat a claim for a prescriptive easement? If it would not, is there a time limit within which the claim must be brought from the date of
Rights of light claims

Rights of light claims

Rights of light claimsThis Practice Note considers whether there is an actionable interference with a right of light, the available remedies (an injunction or damages), and how to seek injunctive relief, including which court, the procedure and documents required.Is there an interference with the

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenants

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenants

Remedies for breach of restrictive covenantsThis Practice Note explains when damages might be awarded in lieu of an injunction, how damages are assessed and what happens if the beneficiary delays in claiming for the breach.Damages or injunction—the testThe primary remedy for breach of a restrictive

Establishing and maintaining rights of light

Establishing and maintaining rights of light

Establishing and maintaining rights of lightThis Practice Note considers when and how a right of light can be established, whether through grant or prescription (a prescriptive right of light is most commonly established under the Prescription Act 1832), and considers when a right of light might be

An individual has had uninterrupted use of land for over 20 years but the use is then interrupted for a

An individual has had uninterrupted use of land for over 20 years but the use is then interrupted for a

An individual has had uninterrupted use of land for over 20 years but the use is then interrupted for a significant period (3–4 years). Would this interruption defeat a claim for a prescriptive easement? If it would not, is there a time limit within which the claim must be brought from the date of