46 Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
Solicitors Act 1974 (1974 c 47) | Legislation

Disciplinary proceedings before Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

46  Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

(1)     Applications and complaints made by virtue of any provision of this Act shall be made, except so far as other provision is made by this Act or by any regulations under it, to the tribunal known as the “Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal”.

(2)     The Master of the Rolls shall appoint the members of the Tribunal.

(3)     The Tribunal shall consist—

(a)     of practising solicitors of not less than ten years' standing (in this section referred to as “solicitor members”); and

(b)     of persons who are neither solicitors nor barristers (in this section referred to as “lay members”).

(4)     A member of the Tribunal shall hold and vacate

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Proprietary estoppel

Proprietary estoppelThis Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel, see Practice Notes:•Estoppel and property law•Mortgages by estoppelProprietary estoppel—what is it?Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice

LEXISNEXIS

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions Tribunal

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions TribunalCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the government’s response to the coronavirus outbreak. In particular, the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Rules Order

LEXISNEXIS

Possession with intent to supply

Possession with intent to supplyPossession with intent to supply a controlled drugIt is an offence for a person to have a controlled drug in his possession, whether lawfully or not, with intent to supply it to another in contravention of section 4(1) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA

LEXISNEXIS

Control of asbestos—duty to manage

The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 (CAR 2012) place various duties on employers to protect employees from risks related to exposure to asbestos and make it clear that these duties, so far as is reasonably practicable, are also owed to any other person, whether at work or not, who may be