Proprietary estoppel


Produced in partnership with Nicholas Macklam of Radcliffe Chambers
Practice notes

Proprietary estoppel


Produced in partnership with Nicholas Macklam of Radcliffe Chambers

Practice notes
imgtext

This Practice Note considers proprietary estoppel from a generic standpoint.

For industry specific guidance on proprietary estoppel for property law practitioners, see Practice Note: Proprietary estoppel for property disputes lawyers.

Proprietary estoppel—what is it?

Unlike the other forms of estoppel (see Practice Note: Estoppel—what, when and how to plead) which cannot ordinarily found a cause of action, proprietary estoppel can. It is typically used where a party (B) seeks to assert a proprietary right to land belonging to another party (A) in circumstances where B has been led to believe, by a promise, words or conduct and/or by acquiescence from A, that they (B) have or can expect to acquire an interest in the land.

The decisions in Ramsden v Dyson and Willmott v Barber provide an appropriate starting point for an understanding of the doctrine. Both were cases where the claimant sought to establish a proprietary interest in someone else's property on the basis that the claimant had spent money on the property in the belief that it was theirs and in circumstances where that belief had

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Proprietary estoppel definition
What does Proprietary estoppel mean?

A means of acquiring rights in land in an informal manner.

Read more

Popular documents

Rescission of a contract

Rescission of a contractThis Practice Note considers the remedy of rescission, summarising when and how a contract may be rescinded (at common law, equity and under statute) and thereby brought to an end. It includes the effect of rescission, the main grounds for rescinding a contract

Novation—why and how to novate a contract

Novation—why and how to novate a contractThere may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the

The doctrine of res judicata

The doctrine of res judicataWhat is a res judicata?A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on

Void contracts

Void contractsThis Practice Note summarises the circumstances in which a contract may be declared void and the consequences when that happens. It distinguishes between void, voidable and unenforceable contracts and considers when a contract may be void due to: common mistake, unilateral mistake as