ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû

Legal News

Release from reverse indemnity undertakings (Knight v Barnsley)

Published on: 12 December 2024

Table of contents

  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Private Client analysis: Her Honour Judge Hilder determined that the Court of Protection did have jurisdiction to determine a dispute over the claimant’s deputy’s release from reverse indemnity undertakings, on the basis that this was the method of resolution the parties had agreed to in the settlement agreement that provided for the reverse indemnity undertakings, albeit she doubted whether it was ‘right’ for civil disputes to be brought to the Court of Protection in this way. She also considered the potential tension in the Court of Protection’s role in such cases and adopted an approach to determining the dispute that aimed to ameliorate that tension whilst maintaining the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005)—mandated focus on P’s best interests. Written by Katherine Hampshire, barrister at Serjeants’ Inn Chambers.

Popular documents