SCHEDULE 9 Further Consequential Amendments
Social Security Contributions (Transfer of Functions, etc) Act 1999 (1999 c 2) | Legislation

SCHEDULE 9 Further Consequential Amendments

Section 26(2)

Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 (c 18)

1

In section 1(5)(f)(iv) (competence of time to pay direction) and section 5(4)(f)(iv) (competence of time to pay order) of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987, as amended by paragraph 12 of Schedule 7 to the Social Security Act 1998, for “Secretary of State†there is substituted “Commissioners of Inland Revenueâ€.

2

In paragraph 35(dd) of Schedule 5 to the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 (interpretation), as inserted by paragraph 14 of Schedule 7 to the Social Security Act 1998, for “Secretary of State†there is substituted “Commissioners of Inland Revenueâ€.

Social Security Contributions and

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Recklessness in criminal cases

Recklessness in criminal casesWhat is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House

LEXISNEXIS

Fraud by false representation

Fraud by false representationFraud by false representationFraud by false representation applies to a broader range of conduct than the offences under the preceding legislation (the Theft Act 1968 (TA 1968)). No gain or loss need actually be made, and no deception need operate on the mind of the

LEXISNEXIS

Escrow accounts and escrow agreements

Escrow accounts and escrow agreementsThis Practice Note examines why parties involved in a construction project may enter into an escrow agreement (or escrow deed) to set up an escrow account. It looks at the benefits of paying funds into escrow, how an escrow account operates and the provisions

LEXISNEXIS

Control of asbestos—duty to manage

The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 (CAR 2012) place various duties on employers to protect employees from risks related to exposure to asbestos and make it clear that these duties, so far as is reasonably practicable, are also owed to any other person, whether at work or not, who may be