[SCHEDULE 2A Offence of Keeping Vehicle which does Not Meet Insurance Requirements: Immobilisation, Removal and Disposal of Vehicles]
Road Traffic Act 1988 (1988 c 52) | Legislation

[SCHEDULE 2A Offence of Keeping Vehicle which does Not Meet Insurance Requirements: Immobilisation, Removal and Disposal of Vehicles]

[Section 144D]

[Immobilisation

1

(1)     Regulations may make provision with respect to any case where an authorised person has reason to believe that, on or after such date as may be prescribed, an offence under section 144A of this Act is being committed as regards a vehicle which is stationary on a road or other public place.

(2)     The regulations may provide that the authorised person or a person acting under his direction may—

(a)     fix an immobilisation device to the vehicle while it remains in the place where it is stationary, or

(b)     move it from that place to another place on the same or another road or public place and fix an immobilisation device to it in that other place.

(3)     The regulations may provide that on any occasion when an immobilisation device is fixed to a vehicle in accordance with the regulations the person fixing the device must also fix to the vehicle a notice—

(a)     indicating that the device has been fixed to the vehicle and warning that no attempt should be made to drive it

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Directors’ remuneration

Directors’ remunerationCompany directors are not, by virtue only of their office as director, automatically entitled under company law to remuneration for services as a director or to reimbursement of expenses incurred in rendering such services. Power to pay directors remuneration for their

LEXISNEXIS

False imprisonment

False imprisonmentLiabilityFalse imprisonment consists of the complete deprivation of liberty without a lawful basis. Claims will in practice be made against a public body that exercises detention powers, usually a local police force, the Secretary of State for the Home Department or the Secretary

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It

LEXISNEXIS

Possession of a bladed article

Possession of a bladed articleThe offence of possession of a bladed articleThe offence of having a bladed article in a public place can be tried in either the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. The magistrates' court will decline jurisdiction in those cases where it appears that its powers of