116 Disputed claims
Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (2000 c 41) | Legislation

116  Disputed claims

(1)     This section applies where—

(a)     a claim for payment in respect of referendum expenses incurred by or on behalf of a permitted participant as mentioned in section 115(1) is sent to—

(i)     the responsible person, or

(ii)     any other person with whose authority it is alleged that the expenditure was incurred,

within the period allowed

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Repudiation

RepudiationThis Practice Note concerns repudiation and sets out what a repudiatory breach of contract means. It explains how a repudiatory breach goes to the core of the contract and the options or remedies available to an innocent party as a result of the other party’s repudiation, which include

LEXISNEXIS

In a business-to-business contract where a contractual long-stop date has passed but the parties wish to

In a business-to-business contract where a contractual long-stop date has passed but the parties wish to continue with the contract, should they document their intention to continue or enter into a new contract?Long-stop dateAs stated in the Drafting Notes to clause: Long-stop date definition, the

LEXISNEXIS

Negligent misstatement—defences and remedies

Negligent misstatement—defences and remediesThere are a number of ways in which liability for negligent misstatement may be avoided and/or limited. For details on founding a claim of negligent misstatement, see Practice Note: Negligent misstatement—founding a claim.For guidance generally on clauses