253 Further provision about seizure
Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 (2009 c 23) | Legislation

253  Further provision about seizure

(1)     Where—

(a)     any items which an enforcement officer wishes to seize and remove are in a container, and

(b)     the officer reasonably considers that it would facilitate the seizure and removal of the items if they remained in the container for that purpose,

any power to seize and remove the items conferred by section 252 includes power to seize and remove the container.

(2)     Where—

(a)     any items which an enforcement officer wishes to seize and remove are not in a container, and

(b)     the officer reasonably considers that it would facilitate the seizure and removal of the

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Repudiation

RepudiationThis Practice Note concerns repudiation and sets out what a repudiatory breach of contract means. It explains how a repudiatory breach goes to the core of the contract and the options or remedies available to an innocent party as a result of the other party’s repudiation, which include

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It

LEXISNEXIS

Collective investment schemes—essentials

Collective investment schemes—essentialsThis Practice Note examines the definition of a collective investment scheme (CIS) and available exemptions, and the treatment of regulated and unregulated CIS.Definition of a collective investment schemeThe definition of a CIS is contained in section 235 of

LEXISNEXIS

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent

Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 allows a claimant to claim damages for non-fraudulent misrepresentation, unless the representor can prove they had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be true. If the representor had reasonable grounds for believing the statement to be