Part 2 Cancellation of Designation by Order
Legal Services Act 2007 (2007 c 29) | Legislation

Part 2 Cancellation of Designation by Order

Introductory

17

This Part of this Schedule applies where the Board considers that it may be appropriate for it to make a recommendation under section 76(5).

Notification of the licensing authority

18

(1)     The Board must give the licensing authority a notice (“a warning noticeâ€) accompanied by a draft of the proposed recommendation.

(2)     The warning notice must—

(a)     state that the Board proposes to make a recommendation under subsection (5) of section 76 in the form of the accompanying draft, and

(b)     state the reasons why the Board is satisfied of the matters mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b) of that subsection.

(3)     The Board must publish a copy of the warning notice.

(4)     The licensing authority may make to the Board—

(a)     written representations, and

(b)     if the Board authorises it to do so, oral representations,

about the proposed recommendation.

(5)     The Board must make rules governing the making of oral and written representations.

(6)     Representations under this paragraph must be made within—

(a)     the period of 28 days beginning with the day on which the warning notice is given to the licensing authority, or

(b)

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions Tribunal

HCPC—Main hearing of the Health and Care Professions TribunalCoronavirus (COVID-19): This Practice Note contains guidance on subjects impacted by the government’s response to the coronavirus outbreak. In particular, the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Rules Order

LEXISNEXIS

The tort of deceit

The tort of deceitDeceit—what is it?A deceit occurs when a misrepresentation is made with the express intention of defrauding a party, subsequently causing loss to that party.The elements of a claim in deceit are:•a clear false representation of fact or law•fraud by the maker, in the sense that they

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It

LEXISNEXIS

Indirect effect of EU law

Indirect effect of EU lawWhat is indirect effect of EU law?The doctrine of indirect effect, or consistent interpretation, is a duty that national courts have, as part of the Member State responsible for fulfilment of EU obligations, to interpret national law in light of EU law, especially with