46 Grant, variation or revocation of authorisation: advice on quality etc
Higher Education and Research Act 2017 (2017 c 29) | Legislation

46  Grant, variation or revocation of authorisation: advice on quality etc

(1)     The OfS must request advice from the relevant body regarding the quality of, and the standards applied to, higher education provided by a provider before making—

(a)     an order under section 42(1) authorising the provider to grant taught awards or research awards,

(b)     a further order under section 42(1)—

(i)     varying an authorisation given to the provider by a previous order under section 42(1), or

(ii)     revoking such an authorisation on the ground that condition B in section 44(5) is satisfied, or

(c)     an order under section 45(1)—

(i)     varying an authorisation given to the provider, as described in that provision, to grant taught awards or research awards, or

(ii)     revoking such an authorisation on the ground that condition B in section 45(7) is satisfied.

(2)     Where the OfS requests advice under subsection (1), the relevant body must provide it.

(3)     The advice provided under

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Notice of assignment

notice of [assignment OR transfer]To: [insert name of landlord][of [insert address] OR whose registered office is at [insert address] Company number [insert number]][and][To: [insert name of head landlord]][of [insert address] OR whose registered office is at [insert address] Company number [insert

LEXISNEXIS

Sentencing for rape

Sentencing for rapeThe Sentencing Council (SC) produces guidance on sentencing for courts in England and Wales in the form of offence specific sentencing guidelines for use in the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court. This Practice Note considers the approach to sentencing for the offences of rape

LEXISNEXIS

Voluntary manslaughter

Voluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughterVoluntary manslaughter consists of those killings which would be murder (because the accused has the relevant mental element for murder) but which are reduced to manslaughter because of one of the three special defences (loss of control, diminished

LEXISNEXIS

Resulting trusts

Resulting trusts represent one of the three types of trust which do not require to be declared or evidenced in writing. The others are constructive and implied trusts, although it is perhaps doubtful whether there is any form of implied trust which is not in fact either a resulting trust or a