108 Reviews and revisions of decommissioning programmes
Energy Act 2004 (2004 c 20) | Legislation

108  Reviews and revisions of decommissioning programmes

(1)     The [appropriate Minister] must, from time to time, conduct such reviews of a decommissioning programme approved by him as he considers appropriate.

(2)     A proposal—

(a)     to modify a decommissioning programme approved by the [appropriate Minister], or

(b)     to modify a condition to which such a programme is subject,

may be made by the [appropriate Minister], or by the person who submitted the programme or (if there is more than one of them) by all of them acting jointly.

(3)     A proposal—

(a)     to relieve a person of his duty under section 109(1) in relation to a decommissioning programme approved by the [appropriate Minister], or

(b)     as respects such a programme, to impose that duty upon a person not previously subject to it (whether in addition to or in substitution for another person),

may be made by the [appropriate Minister] or by the person for the time being

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

179. List of offences triable either way.

  Without prejudice to any other enactment by virtue of which any offence is triable either way1, the following offences are triable either way2:  (1)     offences at common law of public nuisance3;  (2)     an offence at common law of

LEXISNEXIS

Unless orders

Unless ordersThis Practice Note provides guidance on the interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the CPR. Depending on the court in which your matter is proceeding, you may also need to be mindful of additional provisions—see further below.This Practice Note provides guidance on

LEXISNEXIS

Strict liability

Strict liabilityStrict liabilityWhen an offence does not require proof of a mental element it is an offence of strict liability. There are some common law offences of strict liability (eg public nuisance, outraging public decency and contempt) most though are statutory, arising often under

LEXISNEXIS

Money laundering offences—tipping off and prejudicing an investigation

Money laundering offences—tipping off and prejudicing an investigationTipping off and prejudicing an investigationIt would undermine the benefit to the authorities if, a suspicious activity report (SAR) having been made, the alleged offender were to be made aware of the interest in their activities