SCHEDULE 7 The Chief Regulator of Qualifications and Examinations
Education Act 2011 (2011 c 21) | Legislation

SCHEDULE 7 The Chief Regulator of Qualifications and Examinations

Section 21

Amendments to Schedule 9 to ASCLA 2009

1

Schedule 9 to ASCLA 2009 (the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation) is amended as follows.

2

(1)     Paragraph 2 (membership) is amended as follows.

(2)     In sub-paragraph (1)—

(a)     before paragraph (a), insert—

“(za)     a member appointed by Her Majesty by Order in Council as the chief executive of Ofqual,â€;

(b)     in paragraph (a), for “Her Majesty by Order in Council to chair Ofqual,†substitute “the Secretary of State to chair Ofqual (“the chairâ€), andâ€;

(c)     omit paragraph (c) and the “and†immediately before it.

(3)     In sub-paragraph (2), for “to chair†substitute “as the chief executive ofâ€;

(4)     In sub-paragraphs (3) to (6), for “Chief Regulatorâ€, wherever occurring, substitute “chairâ€.

3

(1)     Paragraph 3 (the Chief Regulator) is amended as follows.

(2)     In sub-paragraph (6), for “Chief Regulator†substitute “the

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Violent disorder

Violent disorderThe offence of violent disorderViolent disorder can be tried in the magistrates' court or the Crown Court. These offences will normally be dealt with in the Crown Court. However, there may be cases involving minor violence or threats of violence leading to no or minor injury, with

LEXISNEXIS

The supremacy of EU law

The supremacy of EU lawIP COMPLETION DAY: 11pm (GMT) on 31 December 2020 marks the end of the Brexit transition/implementation period entered into following the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. At this point in time (referred to in UK law as ‘IP completion day’), key transitional arrangements come to an

LEXISNEXIS

Nuisance and the rule in Rylands v Fletcher—common law liability for pollution

Private nuisancePrivate nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it. Interference must be unreasonable, and may be caused, eg by water, smoke, smell, fumes, gas, noise, heat or vibrations. Where the defendant has not

LEXISNEXIS

A chargor (an individual) is granting a legal charge to a chargee (a company). Can an employee of the

There does not appear to be any evidence that an employee of the chargee cannot witness the chargor’s signature.Practice Note: Property deeds—use and execution of deeds in property transactions, provides guidance on who may witness the signature of a deed by an individual:‘There are certain