[537A Provision of information about individual pupils]
Education Act 1996 (1996 c 56) | Legislation

[537A  Provision of information about individual pupils]

[(1)     Regulations may make provision requiring—

(a)     the governing body of every school which is—

(i)     maintained by a [local authority], or

(ii)     a special school which is not maintained by such an authority, and

(b)     the proprietor of every[—

(i)]     independent school, [or

(ii)     alternative provision Academy that is not an independent school,]

to provide to the relevant person such individual pupil information as may be prescribed.

(2)     In subsection (1) “the relevant person” means one or more of the following—

(a)     the Secretary of State, and

(b)     any prescribed person.

(3)

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Community order requirements

Community order requirementsThis Practice Note reflects the procedural code for sentencing offenders in England and Wales (Sentencing Code) that applies from 1 December 2020, as set out in Parts 2–13 of the Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020). For those considering whether the Sentencing Code applies to

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Repudiation

RepudiationThis Practice Note concerns repudiation and sets out what a repudiatory breach of contract means. It explains how a repudiatory breach goes to the core of the contract and the options or remedies available to an innocent party as a result of the other party’s repudiation, which include

LEXISNEXIS

Standard of care in professional negligence claims

Standard of care in professional negligence claimsThis Practice Note considers the standard of care in professional negligence claims, originally formulated in Bolam v Friern Hospital as being that of reasonable skill and care but now reconsidered following Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health. It