24 [Appeals to Upper Tribunal]
Child Support Act 1991 (1991 c 48) | Legislation

24  [Appeals to Upper Tribunal]

[(1)     Each of the following may appeal [to the Upper Tribunal under section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 from any decision

Powered by Lexis+®
 

Popular documents

LEXISNEXIS

Schemes of arrangement—procedure

Schemes of arrangement—procedureProduced with input from Rebecca Cousin of Slaughter and May on market practice.This Practice Note looks at the detailed procedures to be followed to implement the acquisition by a buyer (offeror) of all the shares, or one or more classes of shares, in a company

LEXISNEXIS

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ rule

Costs and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleCosts determination and the ‘without prejudice’ ruleAn issue for practitioners is whether correspondence marked ‘without prejudice’ can be used against a party when the court comes to determine the issue of costs. The Court of Appeal in Walker v Wilsher (1889)

LEXISNEXIS

Recklessness in criminal cases

Recklessness in criminal casesWhat is recklessness?In respect of some statutory offences and common law crimes the prosecution are required to prove a mental element of recklessness on the part of the defendant.Recklessness means unjustified risk taking on the part of the accused.Prior to the House

LEXISNEXIS

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?

Negligence—when is the duty of care breached?Having established that a duty of care exists (see Practice Note: Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?), it is then necessary to consider whether or not there has been a breach of that duty. This will depend on a number of factors outlined below and