Probate actions and family provision claims—costs

Produced in partnership with Adam Draper of Shoosmiths
Practice notes

Probate actions and family provision claims—costs

Produced in partnership with Adam Draper of Shoosmiths

Practice notes
imgtext

STOP PRESS: The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the I(PFD)A 1975 appeal in Hirachand v Hirachand and excluded from the order in favour of the daughter any sum for the success fee. The Supreme Court found that in determining the appropriate relief to be awarded in a I(PFD)A 1975  claim, a judge cannot include directly or indirectly any allowance for a success fee. See News Analysis: Supreme Court unanimously allows appeal (Hirachand v Hirachand and another). This Practice Note is under review following the Supreme Court decision.

The legal costs position in probate claims is often misunderstood.

This Practice Note looks at:

  1. •

    the costs in probate proceedings relating to the validity of the Will, and

  2. •

    claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975)

The starting point—the general rule

The most common misconception is that the costs of the litigation will be paid by the estate. This is not correct.

CPR 44.2 applies to probate proceedings and I(PFD)A 1975 claims. Costs follow the event.

An unsuccessful litigant can expect

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Probate definition
What does Probate mean?

The process of proving (ie establishing the validity of) a Will by the executor. Once the Will has been proved, the court will issue a grant of representation. The Scottish law equivalent is executry.

Popular documents