"We rely on ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients."
Shelter
Access all documents on Enforcement
The action of compelling a party to comply with a judgment where it has not been complied with voluntarily and the time ordered for compliance has expired.
Enforcement is not undertaken by the court of its own motion; a successful claimant must make an application for any enforcement steps to be taken. The relevant procedures are set out in the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, rr 70-73.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
Sentencing Guidelines for Corporate offenders—Money laundering checklist This Checklist summarises the Sentencing Council’s guidelines for money laundering offences committed by a corporate (Money Laundering Guidelines). The Money Laundering Guidelines can be accessed here: • Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guideline—Corporate offenders: fraud, bribery and money laundering—for use in cases involving corporates being sentenced in the magistrates’ court • Crown Court Sentencing Guideline—Corporate offenders: fraud, bribery and money laundering—for use in cases involving corporates being sentenced in the Crown Court The Sentencing Council also publishes a number of overarching guidelines, which should be considered in respect of all sentencing exercises. These include: • Totality guideline (Crown Court) • Totality guideline (magistrates’ court) • General guideline—overarching principles (Crown Court) • General guideline—overarching principles (magistrates’ court) • Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea (Crown Court) • Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea (magistrates’ court) For more information, see Practice Note: Sentences imposed following conviction. Among these overarching guidelines, the General guideline: overarching principles (the General guideline) is specifically designed...
Governing law and jurisdiction clauses in commercial contracts―checklist This Checklist of resources sets out some of the issues when considering governing law and jurisdiction in the context of commercial contracts. Governing law and jurisdiction clauses are categorised as boilerplate clauses in an agreement. For more information on boilerplate clauses, see: Boilerplate clauses—overview. For details about the role of boilerplate clauses and approaches to reviewing and drafting common boilerplate clauses, see Practice Note: The role of boilerplate. A governing law clause (also known as an applicable law clause) is used to allow the parties to specify the substantive law that will apply to the interpretation of an agreement and, in the event of a dispute, in relation to it. For an example of a governing law clause, see Precedent: Governing law clause. The applicable law clause in a contract will usually be set out alongside a jurisdiction clause. It is important to note that jurisdiction and governing law are separate issues. A jurisdiction clause is necessary to allow the parties to...
Discover our 275 Checklists on Enforcement
Life of a health and safety case in Scotland—flowchart This Flowchart demonstrates how health and safety cases progress from investigation, to trial and to Fatal Accident Inquiries (FAIs) in Scotland. It should be read in conjunction with Practice Notes: • Fatal Accident
Enforcing judgments in cross-border disputes—flowchart This Flowchart considers how to enforce a judgment in a cross-border dispute within the EU. It only considers regulations applicable between EU Member States and therefore it does not consider any potential international conventions. In addition to the European procedures, the Flowchart also refers to the enforcement provisions of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 (Brussels I (recast)). Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 provides that a judgment
Discover our 25 Flowcharts on Enforcement
This Practice Note considers the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments applying common law. It explains the requirement for new enforcement proceedings in England and Wales with the foreign judgment as the cause of action. The Practice Note sets out the conditions that need to be met and the common defences that may be raised in relation to a claim to recognise and enforce a foreign judgment. The Practice Note also considers the issue of whether security for costs is available and whether the court should grant a stay pending further court hearings in the foreign court.It is important to check whether a different enforcement regime applies in preference to the common law. For guidance, see: Which regime applies to enforce a foreign judgment?—checklist.When is the common law used?When seeking to enforce a foreign court judgment in England and Wales, it is first necessary to identify which regime applies. There are a number of different statutory regimes which apply variously to specified countries. However, where a judgment creditor wants to...
This Practice Note looks at the most common method of enforcement of an adjudication decision—bringing a Part 7 claim and a summary judgment application in the TCC, as provided for in section 9 of the TCC Guide. It also considers the ability to enforce a decision by seeking a mandatory injunction and the effect of a foreign jurisdiction clause on adjudication enforcement proceedings.Although a Part 7 claim is the normal, and preferable, method of enforcement of an adjudication decision, there are some rarely used alternative methods for enforcement. Parties can apply to the TCC for declaratory relief under CPR Part 8 if there is unlikely to be a substantial dispute of fact and no monetary judgment is sought—see Practice Note: Adjudication and Part 8 proceedings. In some circumstances it may be possible to use insolvency proceedings to enforce the decision of an adjudicator,, see Practice Note: Adjudication enforcement—use of insolvency proceedings.Why enforcement is necessaryUnder the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996), a valid adjudicator’s decision is binding...
Discover our 5476 Practice Notes on Enforcement
Licence to carry out environmental investigations Parties 1 [insert name of licensor] [of [insert address] OR company number [insert company number] whose registered office is at [insert address]] (the Licensor) 2 [insert name of licensee] [of [insert address] OR company number [insert company number] whose registered office is at [insert address]] (the Licensee) 1 Background (A) The Licensor is the registered [freehold OR leasehold] owner of the Property. (B) The Licensee has expressed an interest in [acquiring OR leasing] the Property. (C) The Licensor will permit access to the Property by the Licensee and the Consultant for the purpose of carrying out investigations as to ground conditions at, in, on, under or about the Property, subject to the terms of this Licence. 2 Definitions Competent Authority • means any statutory undertaker or any public local or other authority or regulatory body or government department, or any other body exercising powers under statute or by royal charter or any court of law or any...
Immigration appeal bundle index—template In the immigration and asylum chamber [Insert Home Office, Port and appeal reference numbers as relevant] First-tier tribunal [Insert venue] Between: [Insert name of Appellant] Appellant – and – Secretary of state for the home department Respondent _________________________ Appellant’s bundle _________________________
Dive into our 459 Precedents related to Enforcement
What are unitranche facilities? What is a unitranche facility? Leveraged finance transactions are traditionally funded by a mixture of equity, senior debt, mezzanine debt and/or bonds. A unitranche facility is effectively a blend of the senior and mezzanine portion of the financing although it can sometimes covers part of the equity too. Therefore, instead of two facilities agreements, covenant packages, sets of security documents etc, only one is required. Unitranche facilities are more common on mid-market deals. What are the typical terms of a unitranche facility? Unitranche facilities differ from deal to deal but some typical features are: • the facility will be in the form of a term loan; if a revolving credit facility (RCF) is also required it will normally be documented in the same agreement and share the same security package • bullet repayment or possibly with a back ended amortisation schedule • higher margin than senior debt but lower margin than mezzanine debt; margin may be a mixture of cash and PIK...
What is the position of a security holder if the company that created the security is dissolved? This Q&A focuses on the impact the dissolution of a security provider can have on the ability of a security holder to effectively enforce its security. It also considers the position of a receiver appointed by the security holder prior to the dissolution of the relevant company. Summary If a security provider is dissolved as a matter of English law it is normally still possible for the security holder to enforce the security it holds by exercising the mortgagee’s power of sale. There may be circumstances in any particular case that make an application to restore the dissolved company to the register desirable to protect the security holder’s position. Circumstances where this issue commonly arises The problems associated with a security provider being dissolved while security is in force occur most often in real estate finance and other asset finance transactions. Typically, these issues arise where a special purpose...
See the 1350 Q&As about Enforcement
This week's edition of Corporate Crime weekly highlights includes analysis of a judgment determining how contract rules apply to DPAs, of an EU court ruling that EU sanctions imposed against a Russian billionaire should remain in place, and of the steps that foreign companies should be taking to prepare for the imminent corporate criminal offence of failure to prevent fraud. Also included is news of the commencement of new protection from unfair trading rules under the DMCCA 2024, of the government’s plans for a new reward scheme to encourage informants to come forward to HMRC about tax fraud, and of sentences for individuals after the CPS secures convictions in a £266m money laundering case. All this, and more, in this week’s Corporate Crime highlights.
This week's edition of Energy weekly highlights includes: three News Analyses on (1) potential disputes that could arise in relation to low carbon hydrogen projects as they are increasingly deployed in the UK; (2) an overview of key proposals from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ)’s consultation on a new draft national policy statement (NPS) for nuclear energy generation (EN-7); and (3) a summary of key provisions from the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. In addition this week, Ofgem and DESNZ jointly published a technical decision document, detailing the final key specifications and operational framework of the new Long Duration Electricity Storage (LDES) cap and floor subsidy scheme. We also cover announcements from Ofgem, including the publication of two determinations on its decisions to proceed with the selection of code managers for the Balancing and Settlement Code (BSC) and the Retail Energy Code (REC) on a non-competitive basis, as well as its decision to appoint Elexon as the delivery body for the new Flexibility Market Asset Registration (FMAR)...
Read the latest 18501 News articles on Enforcement
**Trials are provided to all ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234