Why should you subscribe to Inheritance Act Claims: Law, Practice and Procedure
Inheritance Act Claims is the only updateable service devoted to claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family Dependants) Act 1975. The interrelationship of claims under the 1975 Act and other areas of practice means that the law is constantly evolving. First written and published in 2003 by Andrew Francis at Serle Court, this clear and comprehensive work combines detailed explanatory commentary with invaluable precedents, case summaries and useful source material including consolidated legislation.
A subscription to Inheritance Act Claims is:
Up to date - This work is updated twice annually to take account of all changes relevant to the 1975 Act, ensuring you are always kept up to date with developments in the field.
Practical - The text is supplemented by checklists, statutes, CPR, tables and precedent materials, which provide you with everything you need to advance your client's case successfully.
Authoritative - The authors are now a team of contributors, predominantly from 5 Stone Buildings, with extensive experience not only in these claims, but also in divorce, tax and international trusts, ensuring that all angles are covered.
Inheritance Act Claims remains the most comprehensive work available on this increasingly important area of law and is an invaluable resource for private client solicitors, trust practitioners and lawyers as well as Chancery barristers and all family lawyers.
Keith M Gordon MA(Oxon) FCA CTA(Fellow) is a barrister practising from Temple Tax Chambers in London. He previously practised as a chartered accountant and chartered tax adviser. His practice covers all areas of tax and also related areas including partnership disputes and professional negligence. Keith also lectures and writes extensively won the Tax Writer of the Year category in the 2013 ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû Taxation Awards. He was also the Chartered Tax Adviser of the Year in the 2009 awards.
Keith's cases include Jones v Garnett (the 'Arctic Systems' case) where he was the junior barrister for the successful taxpayer in the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords. More recently, he was instructed by the taxpayers in HMRC v Charlton (discovery), Cotter v HMRC (meaning of tax return), Thomson v HMRC (meaning of trade) and the residence cases of Grace and Tuczka.
Keith is an active member of the Chartered Institute of Taxation. He has been a Council member since 2009, sits on a number of