Reputational damage claims—alternative causes of action


Produced in partnership with Mathilde Groppo of Carter-Ruck
Practice notes

Reputational damage claims—alternative causes of action


Produced in partnership with Mathilde Groppo of Carter-Ruck

Practice notes
imgtext

This Practice Note considers the relationship between causes of action for reputational damage claims which may provide alternatives to a defamation claim. The claims considered include malicious falsehood, misuse of private information, breach of confidence, breach of data protection laws, harassment and negligent misstatement.

The tort of defamation is the principal cause of action relied on to protect the right to reputation. Broadly, a defamation claim will arise where there is a publication to third parties of words which lower a claimant in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally, and which convey an imputation capable of causing serious harm to their reputation in circumstances where there is no applicable legal defence. For more information, see Practice Note: Defamation.

In some circumstances, it may be possible and indeed necessary to consider bringing a different type of claim, which might even be against someone other than the primary publisher. While caution should always be exercised about the risks of ‘dressing up’ what would otherwise be a defamation claim (as this would leave a claimant vulnerable

Mathilde Groppo
Mathilde Groppo

Senior Associate, Carter-Ruck

Mathilde is a Senior Associate in the Media Litigation team at Carter-Ruck. Her practice encompasses all aspects of media law. She advises both claimants and defendants, individuals, charities and corporations, often acting against multiple defendants. She has been the lead associate in a number of recent media cases, obtaining the publication of various apologies and corrections, and several payments of 5 figure and 6 figure damages for her clients; and she assisted on various successful injunctions which were converted into permanent undertakings to the Court and into a permanent injunction. She is highlighted as a key lawyer and a rising star in the Legal 500.

Read moreRead more
Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:

Popular documents

Particulars of claim (defamation)

Particulars of claim (defamation)Claim No.: HQ [insert number]IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEKING’S BENCH DIVISIONROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICEMEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LISTParties:(1)[Insert full name of first claimant](2)[[Insert full name of second claimant]]        [Claimant OR Claimants]and[Insert full

¶Ù±ð´Ú²¹³¾²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô—d±ð´Ú±ð²Ô³¦±ð²õ

¶Ù±ð´Ú²¹³¾²¹³Ù¾±´Ç²Ô—d±ð´Ú±ð²Ô³¦±ð²õDefencesThere are a number of substantive defences to a defamation claim, the majority of which are now, since the Defamation Act 2013 (DA 2013), statutory. Any number of defences may be relied upon together in answer to a claim.TruthThere is a presumption that defamatory words

Pre-Action Protocol on Media and Communications Claims

Pre-Action Protocol on Media and Communications ClaimsSTOP PRESS—Impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023: This document contains references to retained EU law (REUL) and associated terms introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 in connection with Brexit. From 1

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of