Misrepresentation—what it is and similar claims


Published by a ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû Dispute Resolution expert
Practice notes

Misrepresentation—what it is and similar claims


Published by a ÀÏ˾»úÎçÒ¹¸£Àû Dispute Resolution expert

Practice notes
imgtext

This Practice Note describes what an actionable misrepresentation is and the key ingredients required for bringing a claim for misrepresentation, the role of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (MA 1967) and provides a comparison with other similar claims. For related guidance on the key elements required to establish a claim for misrepresentation, see Practice Notes:

  1. •

    Misrepresentation—what statements will establish a claim?

  2. •

    Misrepresentation—what is inducement?

  3. •

    Misrepresentation—falsity (fraudulent, innocent or negligent misrepresentation)

For a summary of the practical considerations in misrepresentation claims contrasted with negligent misstatement claims, see Practice Note: Claiming negligent misrepresentation or negligent misstatement—practical considerations.

What is a claim for misrepresentation?

A claim for misrepresentation arises where one party to a contract (the representor) made an untrue statement that induced the other party (the representee) to enter into the contract.

A claim may be made where the representation is made by one contracting party's agent or even, in limited circumstances, where it is made by a third party, see Practice Note: Who can be a party to a claim for misrepresentation?

Where there

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Misrepresentation definition
What does Misrepresentation mean?

A misrepresentation is a pre-contractual false statement of fact or law made by one party to a contract (or his agent) to the other that induced that party to enter into the contract.

Read more

Popular documents

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claim

Negligence—key elements to establish a negligence claimThis Practice Note outlines the key elements for establishing a claim in negligence. For specific guidance on negligence in the context of company/parent company liability, banks and in professional negligence cases, see:•Practice Note: Tortious

Unfair prejudice—Court of Appeal consideration of application to strike out parts of a petition (Zedra

Dispute Resolution analysis: A petitioner claiming unfair prejudice is entitled to rely on breaches by the directors of their fiduciary and statutory duties to the company as conduct of the affairs of the company which was unfairly prejudicial to the petitioner. In this case, Zedra (the petitioner)

Novation—why and how to novate a contract

Novation—why and how to novate a contractThere may be times when, rather than assigning the benefit of an agreement to a third party, the original parties wish instead to end their obligations to each other under that agreement and, in effect, recreate it, with the third party stepping into the

Void contracts

Void contractsThis Practice Note summarises the circumstances in which a contract may be declared void and the consequences when that happens. It distinguishes between void, voidable and unenforceable contracts and considers when a contract may be void due to: common mistake, unilateral mistake as